Rubric

Shark Tank Presentation and Final Paper
Shark Tank Presentation and Final Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
Innovation and Feasability of Business Idea
threshold: pts
10 to >8.0 pts Met Requirements The business idea is highly innovative, original, and clearly addresses a gap in the market or solves a relevant problem. The concept is realistic and feasible, supported by strong evidence.
8 to >6.0 pts Mostly Requirements Met The business idea is somewhat innovative, with a clear value proposition and feasible implementation. Some gaps exist but do not detract significantly from the concept.
6 to >4.0 pts Some Requirements Met The business idea has limited originality and/or feasibility. It addresses a problem but lacks strong evidence or creativity.
4 to >2.67 pts Minimum Requirements Met The business idea lacks originality and has significant feasibility issues. Limited effort to address market problems.
2.67 to >0 pts No Requirements Met The idea is poorly developed, unoriginal, and/or unrealistic.
pts
10 pts
--
Application of Course Concepts
threshold: pts
10 to >8.5 pts Met Requirements The project effectively incorporates key business concepts (e.g., market analysis, financial projections, operations, and marketing strategies) learned in class. Concepts are applied with depth, accuracy, and clear connections to the business plan.
8.5 to >7.0 pts Mostly Met Requirements The project incorporates relevant business concepts, with minor gaps in accuracy or depth. Most concepts are applied well.
7 to >5.0 pts Some Requirements Met Course concepts are applied superficially or inconsistently, with noticeable gaps in accuracy, clarity, or connection to the business idea.
5 to >2.5 pts Minimum Requirements Met Limited application of course concepts; concepts may lack clarity, detail, or accuracy.
2.5 to >0 pts No Requirements Met Course concepts are poorly or not integrated into the project.
pts
10 pts
--
Paper
threshold: pts
30 to >24.0 pts Met Requirements Extensive and well-documented research supports the business plan. The target audience, market trends, financial data, and competitive analysis are detailed, accurate, and insightful.
24 to >18.0 pts Mostly Met Requirements Adequate research supports the business plan. Most aspects (e.g., market trends, financial data, competitive analysis) are covered but lack depth in some areas.
18 to >12.0 pts Some Requirements Met Some research is evident but is incomplete, lacks depth, or has inaccuracies. Limited market analysis or competitive research.
12 to >6.0 pts Minimum Requirements Met Insufficient research with minimal effort to analyze the market, audience, or competition. The plan lacks credible support.
6 to >0 pts No Requirements Met No clear evidence of research or analysis.
pts
30 pts
--
Presentation
threshold: pts
20 to >17.0 pts Met Requirements Presentation is polished, professional, and engaging. Visual aids (e.g., slides or prototypes) are creative, well-designed, and support the pitch. The group demonstrates confidence, clear communication, and strong delivery. Q&A responses are insightful and well-prepared.
17 to >15.0 pts Mostly Met Requirements Presentation is clear, professional, and engaging overall. Visual aids support the pitch effectively. Delivery is confident, with minor gaps in communication or Q&A responses.
15 to >11.0 pts Some Requirements Met Presentation is adequate but may lack polish, professionalism, or engagement. Visual aids are present but lack creativity or quality. Delivery is uneven, and Q&A responses are limited.
11 to >6.0 pts Minimum Requirements Met Presentation lacks professionalism and engagement. Visual aids are poorly designed or absent. Delivery is unclear, and Q&A responses are weak or unprepared.
6 to >0 pts No Requirements Met Presentation is unprofessional, incomplete, or difficult to follow. Visual aids are absent, and the group is unable to address questions effectively.
pts
20 pts
--
Team Collaboration and Contribution
threshold: pts
10 to >8.0 pts Met Requirements Strong evidence of teamwork and collaboration. All group members contributed meaningfully and equitably to the project. Roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and executed effectively.
8 to >7.0 pts Mostly Met Requirements Evidence of teamwork and collaboration is apparent. Most group members contributed meaningfully, with minor imbalances in participation.
7 to >4.0 pts Some Requirements Met : Limited evidence of teamwork. Some group members carried more of the workload, while others contributed minimally.
4 to >3.0 pts Minimum Requirements Met Minimal evidence of collaboration. Imbalances in participation significantly impacted the project outcome.
3 to >0 pts No Requirements Met No evidence of teamwork. The project reflects individual effort or significant conflict.
pts
10 pts
--