Group Project: Shark Tank Business Presentation and Final Paper
DueMay 2 by
11:59pm
Points80
Submittinga file upload
Project Overview: This semester-long group project challenges students to research, develop, and present an innovative business idea in a format inspired by the popular show Shark Tank. Working collaboratively in groups, students will apply key principles and concepts learned throughout the semester to design a compelling business plan and deliver a professional presentation.
Project Objectives:
Foster collaboration and teamwork in developing a cohesive business idea.
Apply business concepts, strategies, and tools learned in class to a real-world scenario.
Enhance critical thinking, research, and presentation skills.
Gain experience in creating a formal business plan.
Project Timeline and Structure:
Formation of Groups & Initial Brainstorming: In the early weeks of the semester, students will form groups and start brainstorming business ideas. These ideas should aim to address a gap in the market, solve a problem, or introduce a novel concept.
Weekly Integration: Each week, students will incorporate relevant course topics—such as market analysis, business strategy, financial planning, operations management, and marketing—into their business plan. Groups will dedicate time to:
Conducting market research and identifying target audiences.
Outlining the value proposition and competitive advantage.
Developing financial projections and pricing strategies.
Planning marketing tactics and operational structures.
Mid-Semester Progress Checkpoint: Groups will present a brief progress report summarizing their business idea, research findings, and development efforts. Feedback will be provided to guide further refinement.
Shark Tank Presentation: Groups will pitch their business idea to a panel of “investors,” demonstrating creativity, research, and confidence. The pitch will include visual aids, such as slides or prototypes, and a Q&A session.
Evaluation Criteria:
Innovation: Originality and feasibility of the business idea.
Application of Course Concepts: Effective integration of class topics into the plan.
Research and Analysis: Depth and accuracy of research supporting the business.
Presentation Quality: Clarity, professionalism, and engagement of the Shark Tank pitch.
Team Collaboration: Evidence of teamwork and shared contribution throughout the project.
Expected Outcomes: By the end of the semester, students will have gained hands-on experience in building a business plan, honed their teamwork and communication skills, and developed a deeper understanding of how theoretical concepts translate into practical business solutions.
10to >8.0 pts
Met RequirementsThe business idea is highly innovative, original, and clearly addresses a gap in the market or solves a relevant problem. The concept is realistic and feasible, supported by strong evidence.blank
8to >6.0 pts
Mostly Requirements MetThe business idea is somewhat innovative, with a clear value proposition and feasible implementation. Some gaps exist but do not detract significantly from the concept._6853
6to >4.0 pts
Some Requirements MetThe business idea has limited originality and/or feasibility. It addresses a problem but lacks strong evidence or creativity._5095
4to >2.67 pts
Minimum Requirements MetThe business idea lacks originality and has significant feasibility issues. Limited effort to address market problems.312264_1890
2.67to >0 pts
No Requirements MetThe idea is poorly developed, unoriginal, and/or unrealistic.blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
10 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Course Concepts_4498
10to >8.5 pts
Met RequirementsThe project effectively incorporates key business concepts (e.g., market analysis, financial projections, operations, and marketing strategies) learned in class. Concepts are applied with depth, accuracy, and clear connections to the business plan._2208
8.5to >7.0 pts
Mostly Met RequirementsThe project incorporates relevant business concepts, with minor gaps in accuracy or depth. Most concepts are applied well._9427
7to >5.0 pts
Some Requirements MetCourse concepts are applied superficially or inconsistently, with noticeable gaps in accuracy, clarity, or connection to the business idea._3136
5to >2.5 pts
Minimum Requirements MetLimited application of course concepts; concepts may lack clarity, detail, or accuracy.312264_7891
2.5to >0 pts
No Requirements MetCourse concepts are poorly or not integrated into the project._4782
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
10 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper_2894
30to >24.0 pts
Met RequirementsExtensive and well-documented research supports the business plan. The target audience, market trends, financial data, and competitive analysis are detailed, accurate, and insightful._9504
24to >18.0 pts
Mostly Met RequirementsAdequate research supports the business plan. Most aspects (e.g., market trends, financial data, competitive analysis) are covered but lack depth in some areas._3227
18to >12.0 pts
Some Requirements MetSome research is evident but is incomplete, lacks depth, or has inaccuracies. Limited market analysis or competitive research._1148
12to >6.0 pts
Minimum Requirements MetInsufficient research with minimal effort to analyze the market, audience, or competition. The plan lacks credible support.312264_5251
6to >0 pts
No Requirements MetNo clear evidence of research or analysis._8565
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
30 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation312264_4206
20to >17.0 pts
Met RequirementsPresentation is polished, professional, and engaging. Visual aids (e.g., slides or prototypes) are creative, well-designed, and support the pitch. The group demonstrates confidence, clear communication, and strong delivery. Q&A responses are insightful and well-prepared.312264_3857
17to >15.0 pts
Mostly Met RequirementsPresentation is clear, professional, and engaging overall. Visual aids support the pitch effectively. Delivery is confident, with minor gaps in communication or Q&A responses.312264_5216
15to >11.0 pts
Some Requirements MetPresentation is adequate but may lack polish, professionalism, or engagement. Visual aids are present but lack creativity or quality. Delivery is uneven, and Q&A responses are limited.312264_1215
11to >6.0 pts
Minimum Requirements MetPresentation lacks professionalism and engagement. Visual aids are poorly designed or absent. Delivery is unclear, and Q&A responses are weak or unprepared.312264_1184
6to >0 pts
No Requirements MetPresentation is unprofessional, incomplete, or difficult to follow. Visual aids are absent, and the group is unable to address questions effectively.312264_5263
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
20 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeam Collaboration and Contribution312264_1160
10to >8.0 pts
Met RequirementsStrong evidence of teamwork and collaboration. All group members contributed meaningfully and equitably to the project. Roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and executed effectively.312264_5778
8to >7.0 pts
Mostly Met RequirementsEvidence of teamwork and collaboration is apparent. Most group members contributed meaningfully, with minor imbalances in participation.312264_1968
7to >4.0 pts
Some Requirements Met: Limited evidence of teamwork. Some group members carried more of the workload, while others contributed minimally.312264_8680
4to >3.0 pts
Minimum Requirements MetMinimal evidence of collaboration. Imbalances in participation significantly impacted the project outcome.312264_2182
3to >0 pts
No Requirements MetNo evidence of teamwork. The project reflects individual effort or significant conflict.312264_5014
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
10 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion