Rubric

Find Rubric
Shark Tank Presentation and Final Paper
Shark Tank Presentation and Final Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
Innovation and Feasability of Business Idea
threshold: pts
10 to >8.0 pts
Met Requirements
The business idea is highly innovative, original, and clearly addresses a gap in the market or solves a relevant problem. The concept is realistic and feasible, supported by strong evidence.
8 to >6.0 pts
Mostly Requirements Met
The business idea is somewhat innovative, with a clear value proposition and feasible implementation. Some gaps exist but do not detract significantly from the concept.
6 to >4.0 pts
Some Requirements Met
The business idea has limited originality and/or feasibility. It addresses a problem but lacks strong evidence or creativity.
4 to >2.67 pts
Minimum Requirements Met
The business idea lacks originality and has significant feasibility issues. Limited effort to address market problems.
2.67 to >0 pts
No Requirements Met
The idea is poorly developed, unoriginal, and/or unrealistic.
pts
10 pts
--
Application of Course Concepts
threshold: pts
10 to >8.5 pts
Met Requirements
The project effectively incorporates key business concepts (e.g., market analysis, financial projections, operations, and marketing strategies) learned in class. Concepts are applied with depth, accuracy, and clear connections to the business plan.
8.5 to >7.0 pts
Mostly Met Requirements
The project incorporates relevant business concepts, with minor gaps in accuracy or depth. Most concepts are applied well.
7 to >5.0 pts
Some Requirements Met
Course concepts are applied superficially or inconsistently, with noticeable gaps in accuracy, clarity, or connection to the business idea.
5 to >2.5 pts
Minimum Requirements Met
Limited application of course concepts; concepts may lack clarity, detail, or accuracy.
2.5 to >0 pts
No Requirements Met
Course concepts are poorly or not integrated into the project.
pts
10 pts
--
Paper
threshold: pts
30 to >24.0 pts
Met Requirements
Extensive and well-documented research supports the business plan. The target audience, market trends, financial data, and competitive analysis are detailed, accurate, and insightful.
24 to >18.0 pts
Mostly Met Requirements
Adequate research supports the business plan. Most aspects (e.g., market trends, financial data, competitive analysis) are covered but lack depth in some areas.
18 to >12.0 pts
Some Requirements Met
Some research is evident but is incomplete, lacks depth, or has inaccuracies. Limited market analysis or competitive research.
12 to >6.0 pts
Minimum Requirements Met
Insufficient research with minimal effort to analyze the market, audience, or competition. The plan lacks credible support.
6 to >0 pts
No Requirements Met
No clear evidence of research or analysis.
pts
30 pts
--
Presentation
threshold: pts
20 to >17.0 pts
Met Requirements
Presentation is polished, professional, and engaging. Visual aids (e.g., slides or prototypes) are creative, well-designed, and support the pitch. The group demonstrates confidence, clear communication, and strong delivery. Q&A responses are insightful and well-prepared.
17 to >15.0 pts
Mostly Met Requirements
Presentation is clear, professional, and engaging overall. Visual aids support the pitch effectively. Delivery is confident, with minor gaps in communication or Q&A responses.
15 to >11.0 pts
Some Requirements Met
Presentation is adequate but may lack polish, professionalism, or engagement. Visual aids are present but lack creativity or quality. Delivery is uneven, and Q&A responses are limited.
11 to >6.0 pts
Minimum Requirements Met
Presentation lacks professionalism and engagement. Visual aids are poorly designed or absent. Delivery is unclear, and Q&A responses are weak or unprepared.
6 to >0 pts
No Requirements Met
Presentation is unprofessional, incomplete, or difficult to follow. Visual aids are absent, and the group is unable to address questions effectively.
pts
20 pts
--
Team Collaboration and Contribution
threshold: pts
10 to >8.0 pts
Met Requirements
Strong evidence of teamwork and collaboration. All group members contributed meaningfully and equitably to the project. Roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and executed effectively.
8 to >7.0 pts
Mostly Met Requirements
Evidence of teamwork and collaboration is apparent. Most group members contributed meaningfully, with minor imbalances in participation.
7 to >4.0 pts
Some Requirements Met
: Limited evidence of teamwork. Some group members carried more of the workload, while others contributed minimally.
4 to >3.0 pts
Minimum Requirements Met
Minimal evidence of collaboration. Imbalances in participation significantly impacted the project outcome.
3 to >0 pts
No Requirements Met
No evidence of teamwork. The project reflects individual effort or significant conflict.
pts
10 pts
--
Total Points: 80 out of 80